Cases 11 - 20 of 47
DeSimone v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2021cv00406
Defendant:
Shield #641 Sergeant Keith Serper, Shield #1586 Detective John Vitale, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph DeSimone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIVESAY et al v. MURPHY
as 3:2020cv17947
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE LIVESAY and NICHOLAS DESIMONE
Defendant:
PHILIP DUNTON MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Desimone et al
as 3:2020cv00886
Defendant:
Henry Rodriguez and Laurence Desimone
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Luis Serrard, Jr. and Guillermo Luis Serrano, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLEIN v. DONATUCCI et al
as 2:2019cv01364
Defendant:
RONALD MICHAEL RONALD, L.P., RONALD R. DONATUCCI, SR., DEBRA J. FOGLIETTA and others
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN E. KLEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLEIN v. DONATUCCI et al
as 2:2019cv00893
Defendant:
ESQUIRE JAMES F. MANNION, RONALD MICHAEL RONALD, L.P., ESQUIRE FRANK DESIMONE and others
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN E. KLEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2018cv05126
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, PO "john" desimne, PO Randy S Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Charles King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ribaudo v. Desimone
as 3:2018cv01190
Plaintiff:
Chris Albert Ribaudo
Defendant:
Samual Desimone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. County of Nassau et al.
as 2:2018cv02277
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Police Officer "John" DeSimone, Police Officer Randy S. Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Charles King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carminucci et al v. Pennelle et al
as 7:2018cv02936
Plaintiff:
John Carminucci and Tin Can Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Sal Pennelle , Beau P. Desimone and Town of Mount Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD et al
as 3:2017cv11401
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD, GREGORY MEYERS, ROBERT DESIMONE and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
