Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Clark v. Rausch et al
as 3:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Clark
Defendant:
David B. Rauch, Tony C. Parker and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Devona Clark, Carla White, Carol Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hurt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. City of Memphis
as 2:2021cv02365
Plaintiff:
Likisha Clark
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Counselor Hannah, Jailer Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark et al v. Castle et al
as 2:2020cv02417
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-5, Matthew Richmond Davis, Michael Shane Dulaney and others
Plaintiff:
Jaleta Clark, Alorea Hardwick, Ernestine Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferrell v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
William M Locke, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Clark (TV2)
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jesus Andres Lujan, Jr.
Defendant:
Donnie Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02676
Defendant:
Jon Alsup, Garrett O'Brien, Stephen Westrich and others
Plaintiff:
Likisha Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stepp v. Wilson et al
as 2:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Stepp, IV
Defendant:
Jeff Wilson, Tim Parker, City of Johnson City TN Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
