Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 3:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, Deborah A. Cooksey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area (Diablo) et al
as 3:2020cv03368
Defendant:
City of Concord, Jose A. Espinoza, Darryl R. Saffold and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2020cv02432
Defendant:
Laura Passaglia, Christopher Walpole, County of Sonoma and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donohue v. City of Concord et al
as 3:2019cv08439
Plaintiff:
John Donohue
Defendant:
Chief of Police Guy Swanger, Concord City of, Daniel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breen v. City of Concord et al
as 3:2019cv05622
Plaintiff:
Anthony Breen
Defendant:
City of Concord, Christopher Blakely, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. City of Concord et al
as 3:2019cv01918
Plaintiff:
Joshua Robertson
Defendant:
City of Concord and Ron Bruckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2018cv07484
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
City Of Concord, Guy Swanger, Daniel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zaragoza-Rios v. City of Concord
as 3:2018cv06803
Defendant:
City of Concord
Plaintiff:
Erik Zaragoza-Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Lawrence v. City of Concord, et al
as 18-15638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY LAWRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CONCORD, GUY SWANGER, Chief, MIKE HANSEN and others
Woolery v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2017cv06786
Plaintiff:
John Woolery
Defendant:
City Of Concord, Concord Police Department, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
