Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Eckard v. Silcox et al
as 1:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Bradley A. Eckard
Defendant:
Katherine H. Silcox, Jessica E. Brewbaker, Nichole Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Benner et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00775
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cassel, John Williams, Nichole Missino and others
Defendant:
Dennis M. David, Rachel Levine and Thomas W. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Campana et al
as 4:2020cv00499
Defendant:
Damon Hagan, Gabriel Campana, William E. Nichols, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Mayes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Campana et al
as 4:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Gabriel Campana, Frederick L. Miller, IV, William E. Nichols, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jody A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2019cv05104
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER and DETECTIVE NICHOLS
Plaintiff:
JESSICA LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NICHOLS v. RUCH et al
as 2:2019cv00617
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RYAN DEL RICCI and ERIC RUCH, JR.
Plaintiff:
TYLER NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Waters et al
as 1:2017cv02201
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Waters
Defendant:
Christine Waters, Nichole Staley O'Gorman and Staley O'Gorman Family Law Practice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aviles v. Eisenhart et al
as 1:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
Julio Aviles, Sr.
Defendant:
Nichole Eisenhart, Eric Shuefobottom, Brett Hopking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. SPRINGDALE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
DARBY NICHOLS
Defendant:
SPRINGDALE BOROUGH, SPRINGDALE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JULIO MEDEIROS, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puscavage et al v. Luzerne County Children and Youth Services et al
as 3:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nichole Puscavage and Anthony Cook
Defendant:
Luzerne County Children and Youth Services and Luzerne County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
