Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Aldulaimi v. Department of Justice
as 5:2020cv00719
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Salwan Ali Abed Aldulaimi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glickstein et al v. AB InBev et al
as 1:2020cv03845
Defendant:
Carlos Brito, Craig Katerberg, AB InBev and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glickstein and G Asset Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHING-YUAN et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00435
Defendant:
US AIR FORCE, ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES, COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF US SPACE COMMAND and others
Plaintiff:
LIN MING-HUI, TSENG CHING-YUAN, TSAI CHIA-HENG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISENHOOVER v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00039
Defendant:
WILLIAM CHRISTENSEN, TARO KONO, PHILIP S. DAVIDSON and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. KEYBANK CAPITAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03460
Defendant:
CORPORATE PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC, KEY RECREATION LENDING, POST OFFICE SQUARE FUNDING INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salameh v. Royal Jordanian
as 4:2019cv11403
Plaintiff:
Abdelhakim Abed Salameh
Defendant:
Royal Jordanian
Sihpol et al v. Deutsche National Bank Trust Company
as 1:2019cv00511
Plaintiff:
Todd Sihpol and Stephanie Sihpol
Defendant:
Deutsche National Bank Trust Company, As Trustee In Trust For The Registered Holders Of Morgan Stanley ABS, Capital 1Inc. Trust-HE8, Its Successors And Assigns and Deutsche National Bank Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Hancock County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00354
Defendant:
Hancock County, Mississippi, Milton Aric Latschar, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Martinez and Marcos Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Abe et al
as 2:2018cv02789
Defendant:
Henry Abe, Alan Garza, Tamara Pesci and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron D. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
