Cases 371 - 380 of 1,482
Porter v. DHHR Behavioral Health
as 2:2019cv00005
Defendant:
DHHR Behavioral Health
Plaintiff:
Antwain Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rollins v. Franks et al
as 3:2019cv00109
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Brian Franks, The West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayle v. Clarksburg City Police et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Justin Moore and Clarksburg City Police
Plaintiff:
Tommy Tucker Mayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Martin Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00373
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jones
Defendant:
Martin Transport, Inc., Martin Resource Management Corporation, Martin Midstream Partners, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ziegler v. Clay County Sheriff et al
as 2:2019cv00410
Defendant:
Fran King, M. P. Morris, Clay County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Harris et al
as 2:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris and Joint Chiefs of Staff
Petitioner:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Proctor v. Roane County Commission et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Z. W. Hartley, S. A. McDonald, M. P. King and others
Plaintiff:
Brad E. Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of West Virginia, et al.
as 1:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
Patrick Morrisey and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Mabry v. Jividen et al
as 2:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Donald Slack, Captain Brian Pinick, Timothy Forren and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Comer et al
as 2:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Ronnie J. Drake, Robert M. Mefford and Joseph M. Comer
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
