Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Wade v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01122
Petitioner:
Jamal H Wade
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox v. Quartzsite, Town of et al
as 2:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wilcox
Defendant:
Quartzsite, Town of , H Anakeyowma , Unknown Anakeyowma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valles et al v. Pima County et al
as 4:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ismat Awdish, Reuben Grinstein, Armando Valles and others
Defendant:
GC Enterprises GP, Manchester Development Corporation LLC, Thomas E Hosack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephenson v. Miller
as 2:2014cv02703
Plaintiff:
Joe H Stephenson
Defendant:
Leonard Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pellerin et al v. Wagner et al
as 2:2014cv02318
Plaintiff:
Devin Pellerin and Angie Pellerin
Defendant:
Caryn Wagner, Lyn Hart, Clarence H Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoyos v. Villard et al
as 2:2014cv02220
Plaintiff:
Carolina Hoyos
Defendant:
Barbara A Villard , Daniel A Moore , Michele Clute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatfield v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2014cv01844
Plaintiff:
Donald J Hatfield
Defendant:
Shelly E Hatfield, Estate of Linda C ONeal, Jerry P Weiers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin El v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01813
Plaintiff:
Michael H Ruffin El
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Phoenix, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ahmed v. Arizona State University et al
as 2:2014cv01626
Plaintiff:
Abubakar Hussein Ahmed
Defendant:
Arizona State University, Federal Bureau of Investigation, John Chipolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rascon et al v. Brookins et al
as 2:2014cv00749
Plaintiff:
L Alicia Rascon , Juan A Sanchez and Toni Marquis
Defendant:
Clinton H Brookins, Jeremy King, Nicholas R Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
