Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Simone, Jr. v. Monaco et al
as 4:2019cv11070
Defendant:
Jonathan Bourget, Clark Gephardt, Robert Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Simone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. City of Northampton et al
as 3:2019cv30027
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Kevin Brown, Joseph Bianca, Andrew Linkenhoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv10304
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker, Governor Phil Bryant, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemens v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018mc91452
Defendant:
Amanda O' Shea, Andrew Quigley, Mr. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Clemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Pittsfield, City of et al
as 3:2018cv30146
Defendant:
Pittsfield Police Department, Daniel Bianchi, Pittsfield Retirement Board and others
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pare v. Pare et al
as 3:2018cv30055
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Pare
Defendant:
Cindy L. Pare, Maria Desmarais, Ernest Laflamme, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clapp v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv10426
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Clapp
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Michael W. Morrissey, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perrot v. Kelly et al
as 1:2018cv10147
Plaintiff:
George Perrot
Defendant:
Thomas Kelly, Thomas Jarvis, Richard Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heasley et al v. Vistaprint Corporate Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10076
Plaintiff:
Stephen Heasley and Andrew Borg
Defendant:
Vistaprint Corporate Solutions, Inc., Vistaprint.com, Inc., Cimpress USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winfield et al v. Town of Andover et al
as 1:2017cv11051
Plaintiff:
Marie Winfield and Robert Winfield
Defendant:
Town of Andover , Christopher Hughes , Sobahn Namvar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
