Cases 31 - 40 of 69
McDaniels v. McKelvey et al
as 4:2016cv00404
Plaintiff:
Herbert McDaniels
Defendant:
Rick McKelvey, Daniel Watson, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
Mullen and Thurstle Mullen
Defendant:
Jonesboro Arkansas, City of, Heath Loggains, Daniel Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rochell v. City of Springdale Police Department et al
as 5:2016cv05093
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Rochell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Springdale Police Department, City of Fayetteville Police Department, Sutley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv02011
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin
Defendant:
David Martin , Lisa Franklin and Van Buren, Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hash v. Arkansas State Court System et al
as 4:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Hash
Defendant:
Arkansas State Court System, Cynthia D Hash, Sandy Huckabee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Champion et al
as 4:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Champion, Linda Daniels, Calvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Starbuck et al
as 4:2015cv00233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin Powell
Defendant:
David Starbuck and Faulkner County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dore v. Sutterfield et al
as 3:2014cv03069
Plaintiff:
Nicholas M. Dore
Defendant:
Daniel Sutterfield, David Chatman and The City of Bull Shoals, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00481
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
