Cases 31 - 40 of 4,584
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Barrett
as 24-10396
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Miller
Defendant:
Amy Coney Barrett, In Her Official Capacity, Neil Gorsuch, In His Official Capacity, John G. Roberts, In His Official Capacity and others
Weems (PS) v. Cementary Staff Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Tyra Weems
Defendant:
Cementary Staff Georgia, Clifford Harriss, Jarvis Weems Knot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lorraine East, et al v. Marissa McDermott, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE C. EAST and LA'NADREA A. MILLER
Defendant:
MARISSA MCDERMOTT, BENJAMIN T. BALLOU, FRANCISCAN HEALTH CROWN POINT and others
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleveland v. Prendergast et al
as 5:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Alginavon Teriano Cleveland
Defendant:
Michael Prendergast, David Miller, Evan Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
