Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Ponce et al v. Washburn et al
as 1:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
David Ponce, Anthony Barker, Jesse Gomez and others
Defendant:
Officer Washburn, Josh Chavez, Officer Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponce v. Amtrak Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv01200
Plaintiff:
David Ponce
Defendant:
Amtrak Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponce v. Hanford Police Department K-9 Unit
as 1:2021cv01110
Plaintiff:
David Ponce
Defendant:
Hanford Police Department K-9 Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyola-Lugo v. VPH Motor Corp et al
as 3:2021cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Loyola-Lugo
Defendant:
VPH Motor Corp. doing business as Triangle Chrysler Fiat de Ponce and John Doe
Ponce v. Hanford Police Department K-9 Unit
as 1:2021cv01045
Plaintiff:
David Ponce
Defendant:
Hanford Police Department K-9 Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enciso v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jay Enciso
Defendant:
Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Herman Gleicher, Darlene Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of Education of the United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01040
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica Ponce, Department of Education of the United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Garrett v. Board of County Commissioners of Eddy County et al
as 2:2020cv01363
Defendant:
Sylvia J Marin, Darla Bannister, Joel Parraz and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz-Romero v. YMCA Ponce, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01625
Defendant:
YMCA Ponce, Inc., Ponce YMCA, Inc. and Maritza Correa-Perez
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
