Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Preston Schofield v. Jane Castor, et al
as 15-14805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE CASTOR, Tampa Police Chief and CITY OF TAMPA, FL
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 15-7113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Preston Schofield
Defendant - Appellee:
James Dekleva, Judge and State of Florida
Kyle Kirchner v. TN, et al
as 15-5721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE KIRCHNER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD and others
Defendant:
JONATHAN EDGEMON and ARRON SILVIERA
Morris v. Jordan et al
as 2:2015cv02428
Plaintiff:
Janie Morris
Defendant:
Nicky Jordan, Brenda Jones, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitnum v. Emons et al
as 3:2015cv00959
Plaintiff:
L. "Lee" Whitnum
Defendant:
Jane Emons, Marylouise Schofield, John Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
SCHOFIELD v. DEKLEVA et al
as 1:2015cv00963
Plaintiff:
PRESTON SCHOFIELD
Defendant:
JAMES DEKLEVA and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lepeska v. Naugatuck et al
as 3:2015cv00694
Plaintiff:
John Lepeska
Defendant:
Borough of Naugatuck and Charles Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Preston Schofield v. Jane Castor, et al
as 15-11904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE CASTOR, Tampa Police Chief and CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Humanist Association, Inc. et al v. Hall County School District et al
as 2:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association, Inc. , Jane Doe , Jane Roe and others
Defendant:
Hall County School District , Will Schofield and Suzanne Jarrard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
