Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Elizah Sheppard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 12-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZAH SHEPPARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant:
JOEL SMITH, named as Prevention Officer Joel Smith and DOE, Unknown parties named as et al
Tucker v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
Debbie Tucker
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Amy Cook, Ray Mabus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARNEY v. JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER et al
as 1:2011cv07366
Plaintiff:
DAMON CARNEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER, PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PENNSAUKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv24459
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Molina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elizah Sheppard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 11-1708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZAH SHEPPARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC., JOEL SMITH, named as Prevention Officer Joel Smith and DOE, Unknown parties named as et al
Bruno v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv21258
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Bruno
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Holiday CVS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrales v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv21261
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ferrales
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Holiday CVS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawless v. Ladies Professional Golf Association et al
as 4:2010cv04599
Plaintiff:
Lana Lawless
Defendant:
Ladies Professional Golf Association, Long Drivers of America, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.
as 3:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Frederick
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Frazier v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
Crystal Frazier
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Sandra Batten and Deanna Deskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
