Cases 41 - 50 of 72
GRAHAM et al v. BOROUGH OF LIGONIER et al
as 2:2015cv01130
Plaintiff:
TODD GRAHAM and SPENCER KOZAR
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LIGONIER , JOHN BERGER , GREGORY SULLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYER v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
WURLIN GRAHAM and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN , RUSSELL J. BONO , CHARLES DOUGLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham-Smith et al v. Wilkes-Barre Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv02159
Plaintiff:
Delilah A. Graham-Smith and Rodney G. Smith
Defendant:
Wilkes-Barre Police Department, City of Wilkes-Barre, Alan Gribble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOWERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06356
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLOWERS , JUDAH WILLIAMS , BRADY FLOYD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn et al v. Graham et al
as 3:2014cv01736
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dunn and Anna Dunn
Defendant:
James Graham and Pittston Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. ROSENBLUM et al
as 2:2014cv03390
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID ROSENBLUM, SUSIE ROSENBLUM, D&F CLOTHING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02331
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spanier v. Kane
as 1:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Graham B. Spanier
Defendant:
Kathleen G. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pierre v. Beebe Hospital / Medical Center et al
as 1:2013cv02881
Plaintiff:
Raymond Pierre
Defendant:
Beebe Hospital / Medical Center, Beebe Medial Center Pavillion, William Swain Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
