Cases 41 - 50 of 117
U.S. Bank National Association v. Charles et al
as 3:2018cv01171
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Marie Cherry, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hussian v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2018cv03250
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and RAS Boriskin, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shameer Hussian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parrott et al v. Miesels et al
as 3:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
Joseph Parrott, Sr. and Jo-Lynn J. Parrott
Defendant:
Jonathan Miesels, Jessica Conte, Jennifer Scott Mouser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2018cv00791
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Lewis
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Andrew Cecere, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association v. Jefferson et al
as 4:2018cv00761
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Dezra Jefferson and Vincent Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al v. CHAPMAN
as 1:2017cv02863
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, GINNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC and others
Defendant:
LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CHAPMAN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASSELL v. LEVY et al
as 2:2017cv05508
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL CASSELL
Defendant:
MARK LEVY , U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , KML LAW GROUP, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv24280
Plaintiff:
British D. Moss
Defendant:
Richard K. Davis, Andrew Cecere, Jennie P. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ardis v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 17-14251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Robert Ardis v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 17-14250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.