Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Bailey v. Toman et al
as 5:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
William C. Toman, Jr., R. M. Ashley, K. D. Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Barrero et al
as 5:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia Barrero, Tom Watson, Aaron Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Clark et al
as 5:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
W. Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
John Vincent Clark, Robert Lewis Kimbrough, Jr., Melvin Eugene Spriggs, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Clark et al
as 5:2012cv00707
Plaintiff:
W. Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
John Vincent Clark, Robert Lewis Kimbrough, Jr., Melvin Eugene Spriggs, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Perdue, et al
as 5:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr. and J.F.D.
Defendant:
Beverly Perdue, William C. Harrison, Rosa U. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. O'Geary, et al
as 5:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
JAMES P. O'GEARY , SAM CURRIN, County of Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frizzell v. State of NC et al
as 3:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Paul Frizzell
Defendant:
State of NC, Rebecca Thorne Tin, Richard Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. O'GEARY et al
as 1:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
JAMES P. O'GEARY, SEAN CURRIN, COUNTY OF VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane et al v. Parker et al
as 5:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
Martrell Lane and Derrick Lewis
Defendant:
Travis A. Parker and City of Sharpsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2011cv00870
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
