Cases 71 - 80 of 175
Tolliver v. Justus et al
as 1:2016cv10160
Plaintiff:
Antonio R. Tolliver
Defendant:
Ralph W. Justus, Christopher S. Kane, Jacob C. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe, et al. v. Board of Education of the County of Mercer
as 1:2016cv08318
Plaintiff:
John Doe and M. Doe
Defendant:
Board of Education of the County of Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Farley et al
as 2:2016cv06161
Plaintiff:
Keith Ellis
Defendant:
Ken Farley, JJ Napier and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodrum v. Farley et al
as 2:2016cv06163
Plaintiff:
Dewey Woodrum
Defendant:
Ken Farley, JJ Napier and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Farley et al
as 2:2016cv06162
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ellis
Defendant:
Ken Farley, JJ Napier and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. Farmer et al
as 1:2016cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
David A. Farmer, Primecare Medical, Inc., Scott Villers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggleston v. Burke et al
as 5:2016cv04451
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eggleston
Defendant:
Austin G. Burke, Paul O'Dell, Joe Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter et al v. Perry et al
as 2:2016cv04199
Plaintiff:
Sara Carpenter and Robert Carpenter
Defendant:
J.D. Perry, R.S. Minor, J.R. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Vance et al
as 2:2016cv02593
Plaintiff:
Ruben Castillo
Defendant:
Jeremiah Vance, West Virginia Regional Jail Authority , West Virginia Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spry et al v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2016cv01785
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Spry , Curly E. Spry and Britney Spry
Defendant:
State of West Virginia , West Virginia Department of Public Safety/The West Virginia State Police , C. R. "Jay" Smithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
