Cases 71 - 80 of 188
Burgess v. Worley et al
as 4:2017cv00782
Defendant:
Carmen Rivera Worley, Gene Sera, Ashleigh Woodoll and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Earl Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Serrano v U.S. Customs and Border, et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Defendant:
Customs and Border Patrol, John Doe 1-X, Juan Espinoza and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kharb, Praveen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kharb
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatcher v. Nueces County, Texas et al
as 2:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
Charles Hatcher
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas , John Doe, #1, John Doe, #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pickett v. Cain et al
as 9:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jody Wayne Pickett
Defendant:
Christopher B Cain , County of Polk, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner et al v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2017cv01020
Plaintiff:
Charae' Ellese Bonner , ACL and Marilyn J Bonner
Defendant:
City of DeSoto TX , Preston Hammel , Philip Siegler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vo v. Wolfe et al
as 4:2017cv00981
Plaintiff:
Binh Vo
Defendant:
Michael Wolfe , David W Hartley and John Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2017cv00563
Defendant:
Clay Jenkins, County of Dallas, John Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Damon Richardson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Murphy et al
as 9:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jody Wayne Pickett
Defendant:
Sydney Murphy, County of Polk, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v Hunt County et al
as 3:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Deanna J Robinson
Defendant:
Hunt County, Texas , Randy Meeks and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
