Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Jackson v. Hill
as 1:2010cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jackson
Defendant:
Mark K. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Granholm et al
as 5:2010cv14568
Plaintiff:
Henry Hill , Jemal Tipton , Damion Todd and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Patricia Caruso and Barbara Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2010cv12990
Plaintiff:
Hill Sanders, III
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Williams et al v. Detroit Public Schools, et al
as 2:2010cv11797
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williams , Veola Williams , Barbara Williams and others
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools, Ronald Hendon, Charles Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hill et al v. Dew et al
as 2:2010cv11427
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hill
Defendant:
Jelani Dew, Adrian Singleton and Shawn Geraud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill #710938 v. Michigan Secretary of State et al
as 1:2010cv00310
Plaintiff:
Richard Theodore Hill #710938
Defendant:
Michigan Secretary of State and Michigan Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lowe v. Anderson et al
as 2:2010cv11189
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lowe
Defendant:
Flossie Anderson, D. Block, Charles Brown and others
Kendall v. Shock et al
as 5:2010cv11088
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kendall
Defendant:
Howard Shock, Matthew Malcolm, Lee Davis and others
Sallie et al v. Collins #14012-040 et al
as 1:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Sherod D. Sallie, Omar M. Boyd, Larry T. Hooks and others
Defendant:
Andrew Thomas Collins #14012-040, Bernard Hall and Benton Harbor, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lakewood Hills, L.L.C. v. East Grand Rapids, City of
as 1:2009cv00603
Plaintiff:
Lakewood Hills, L.L.C.
Defendant:
East Grand Rapids, City of and East Grand Rapids, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
