Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MOORE v. MANSBERRY et al
as 1:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
CAROL D. MOORE
Defendant:
STEVE MANSBERRY, ALICE C. STUBBS and THARRINGTON SMITH, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley v. Atrium Health et al
as 3:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Julia Stanley
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Daniel LNU, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridges-Walker v. Alliance Health et al
as 5:2021cv00336
Defendant:
Alliance Health, ALLIANCE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, Michelle Steva and others
Plaintiff:
Odaysia Bridges-Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. The State of North Carolina, 10th Judicial District, Criminal Courts et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Howard Green McCoy, Robert Early Howard, Jr., James Howard Hickland and others
Plaintiff:
Nadia Arlette Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roberts v. Perry, et al.
as 5:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Alice Thomason Roberts
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Erik A. Hooks, W. David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Perry, et al.
as 5:2018ct03152
Plaintiff:
Alice Thomason Roberts
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Erik A. Hooks, W. David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARLISLE v. PARKVIEW CHRISTIAN DAYCARE
as 1:2018cv00330
Defendant:
PARKVIEW CHRISTIAN DAYCARE
Plaintiff:
ALICE CAMERON CARLISLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell et al v. Wood et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Burl Anderson Howell and Alice Annette Howell
Defendant:
George A. Wood, Resee Phelps, Lou Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell et al v. Horne
as 5:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Burl Anderson Howell and Alice Annette Howell
Defendant:
Daniel M. Horne, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
