Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARNER v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY DAVID WARNER
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. FREEMAN
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Defendant:
CHRIS FREEMAN, CAPTAIN SHANE BULLINS, SHERIFF SAM SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Defendant:
Jeffery Preston Bezos and Amazon.Com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Gordon Knapp, Bridgestone Corporation, Hector Lockamy and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Defendant:
Jeffery Preston Bezos and Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Shanae Knox, Joseph Godfrey, Samuel Vazquez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
