Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Tennesse Valley Authority
as 3:2023cv01693
Plaintiff:
Shalana Pierce
Defendant:
Tennesse Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
West Alabama Women's Center et al v. Marshall (MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
West Alabama Women's Center, Yashica Robinson and Alabama Women's Center
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R. Adair, T. Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pettway v. Pettway et al
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Pettway
Defendant:
Jamal Pettway, Tabitha Lamar, Rodrick Sheldton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vestavia Plaza LLC v. Vestavia Hills, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2011cv04152
Plaintiff:
Vestavia Plaza LLC
Defendant:
Vestavia Hills, Alabama, City of , George Pierce , Steve Ammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cain v. Mental Health Center of North Central Alabama, Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Victoria Cain
Defendant:
Mental Health Center of North Central Alabama, Inc, Linda Pierce and Heather Stone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timberlake v. Scottsboro, Alabama, City of et al
as 5:2008cv01829
Plaintiff:
Nicole Timberlake
Defendant:
Scottsboro, Alabama, City of, Ralph Dawe, Mike Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
