Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cooke et al v. Charleston County School District et al
as 2:2021cv03415
Plaintiff:
John Cooke, Monica Cooke, Gregory Montieth and others
Defendant:
Charleston County School District, Eric Mack, Courtney Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Apple Inc et al
as 6:2019cv02548
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Tim Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 0:2019cv00973
Defendant:
Ms. Christa T. Bell, Mr. David B. Love, South Carolina Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Apple Inc et al
as 6:2017cv02149
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Tim Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.S. v. Daniels et al
as 8:2016cv01032
Plaintiff:
W.S.
Defendant:
Cassandra Daniels , Ursula Best , South Carolina Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 6:2015cv01348
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Cook and Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Hancock
as 0:2012cv01569
Plaintiff:
DeQauion Keyvon Cook
Defendant:
James W Hancock, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kelly v. South Carolina Department of Labor Licensing and Regulation et al
as 3:2011cv03495
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelly
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Labor Licensing and Regulation, Catherine Templeton, Ron Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard et al v. Cook et al
as 9:2010cv02965
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lynn Ballard and Bonnie Carlson
Defendant:
Christopher Cook, Stuart Mankin and Beaufort County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad WKA Qadir v. Hartford Insurance Company, The, et al
as 4:2009cv03170
Plaintiff:
Muhammad WKA Qadir
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company, The, Charlene Betancourt, H L Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
