Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thomas v. City of Baker et al
as 3:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Nancy Thomas
Defendant:
City of Baker and Darnell Waites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker, et al v. Pohlmann, et al
as 2:2020cv03464
Defendant:
Keshonka Rucker, Deputy D'Antoni, Audrey Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Walker, Jr. and Angela Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. City of Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00547
Defendant:
Bryan Holiday and City of Baker
Plaintiff:
Cedric Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Southern University et al
as 3:2018cv01034
Defendant:
Terrilynn Gillis, Amelia Major, Sage Rehabilitation Outpatient and others
Plaintiff:
Shantrice L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams et al v. Baton Rouge Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Baker and Yaskitha Williams
Defendant:
Baton Rouge Police Department, Carl Dabadie and Enterprise Rental Car
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emperador-Baker v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino
as 2:2016cv17058
Defendant:
Harrah's New Orleans Casino
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Emperador-Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Felks v. Holden et al
as 3:2016cv00143
Defendant:
City of Baker, Mark Holden, Avery Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Felks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Ephia
as 3:2015cv00838
Plaintiff:
Sede Baker
Defendant:
Unknown Ephia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Emerald Correctional Management et al
as 3:2013cv02562
Plaintiff:
Demario B Jones
Defendant:
Emerald Correctional Management and MacArthur Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2013cv00379
Defendant:
Pamela J. Baker, Kimberly L. Brooks, City-Parish of Baton Rouge and others
225) 216-0052 (fax:
Lance A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
