Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MOSKOVITS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02958
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MOSKOVITS
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KASAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
HELEN KASAY and HELEN A. KASAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JAMES WALKER, INEZ SAKI-TAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORMLY v. WALKER et al
as 1:2021cv02688
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GORMLY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INEZ SAKI-TAY, JAMES WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR v. BARNES et al
as 1:2021cv02641
Plaintiff:
NYKA O'CONNOR
Defendant:
REDMOND BARNES, SCOTT HARRIS, JOHN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIXON v. BARNES
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
TRACY NIXON
Defendant:
REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. PARK PLACE INC et al
as 1:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PARK PLACE INC , MARC BARNES , MAYNOR GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
