Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Graham III v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Frank Graham III
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guthrie v. Stowe et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tonya Guthrie
Defendant:
Graham Stowe and Giles County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Bennett
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, Tennessee State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02357
Defendant:
Donna Randolph, Rodney Sims, Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
Selma Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Sequatchie County Government et al
as 1:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Marion County Government, Ronnie Bo Burnett, Paige Durham and others
Plaintiff:
Willard J King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Edgar Muir v. Marion County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Marion County Government, 12th Judicial Drug & Violent Crime Task Force, Charlie Rittenberry and others
Plaintiff:
William Edgar Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Marion County Sheriff et al (JRG2)
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant:
Ronnie "Bo" Burnette and Marion County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Betty Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land , Clayton Smith , Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cahill-Lujan v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Roberta Ann Cahill-Lujan
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee and Nicholas Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowery v. Brantley et al
as 3:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bowery
Defendant:
Graham Brantley and City of Sevierville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
