Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PEEDE v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 3:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEEDE and ROBERT PEEDE, JR.
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CAPORALE et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 3:2021cv20484
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CAPORALE, TIM UNES, MAGGIE MULVANEY and others
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davenport v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
as 6:2016cv06590
Plaintiff:
Victoria Evelyn Davenport
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stegemann v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Stegemann
Defendant:
Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office, Rensselaer County, Christopher Perilli and others
Cross Defendant:
Unknown Members of Fulton County Sheriffs Office Canine Team, Berkshire County Drug Task Force, Investigator Film and others
Cross Claimant:
Subsurface Informational Surveys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gore v. Verizon Wireless
as 4:2014cv00020
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a/ Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff:
Latonya F. Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toomer v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al
as 1:2011cv07515
Plaintiff:
Virginia Toomer
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Leslie Guzman, The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
as 4:2010cv00210
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CREAN v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
as 4:2010cv00211
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
Plaintiff:
DONALD CREAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
