Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Catoe v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Will Catoe
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, Ricky Terry, Scott Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Hamm et al
as 2:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Fred Turner
Defendant:
John Hamm, Patricia Jones and David Lamar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammock v. Taunton et al
as 2:2021cv00793
Plaintiff:
John Hammock
Defendant:
Jeremy Taunton, Sarah Hill, Damian Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosser et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Prosser, Brooke Prosser, Fred Rush and others
Defendant:
B. T. Roberts, Clark Sahlie, James W. Rane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. County of Limestone, Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Deputy Jake Abernathy, Srt. Commander Rhett McNatt, County of Limestone, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Ronald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Busby
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Fred Eddie "Sam Cooper
Defendant:
A. R. Busby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gholston v. Fred's Store #1573
as 5:2014cv02324
Plaintiff:
Monzell Gholston
Defendant:
Fred's Store #1573
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puckett v. Willis et al
as 1:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
David Cicero Puckett
Defendant:
Jeff Willis, Fred W Thompson, Clay County Sheriff's Department and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Bessemer City Board of Education et al
as 2:2012cv01063
Plaintiff:
Stacey Cook
Defendant:
Bessemer City Board of Education , Vera Eades , Renna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Allen v. Cypress Village, LTD. et al
as 3:2010cv00994
Plaintiff:
Charisse D. Allen
Defendant:
Cypress Village, LTD., The Bennett Group, Fred Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
