Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schmitt v. Franklin County House of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv30012
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Schmitt
Defendant:
Franklin County House of Corrections and Northwestern District Attorneys office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Joubert v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv40111
Plaintiff:
Mark Joubert
Defendant:
Hon. Justice Mark V. Green, Hon. Judith Fabricant, Justice Gabrielle R. Wolohojian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linardon v. Wolohojian
as 1:2020cv10969
Plaintiff:
Kelechi Linardon
Defendant:
Gabrielle R Wolohojian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schmitt v. Baker
as 1:2020cv10618
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Molloy et al v. City of Holyoke, Massachusetts et al
as 3:2018cv30182
Defendant:
Alex Morse, City of Holyoke, Massachusetts and Damian Cote
Plaintiff:
Danielle Ryan, Lisa Ahlstrom, Kaitlin Molloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordero v. Pack et al
as 3:2018cv30031
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Cordero
Defendant:
Noah H. Pack, Brandon Donova, Patrick Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. Pecci
as 1:2017cv11014
Plaintiff:
Galvin Gabriel
Defendant:
Matthew Pecci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis-Scott v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2014cv12874
Plaintiff:
Judith Davis-Scott
Defendant:
City of Brockton , David Delehoy , Steven Lopes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lajoie v. Gabriel Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11727
Plaintiff:
Loriann Lajoie
Defendant:
Gabriel Care, Inc. and Dennis Etzkorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gabriel v. Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences et al
as 1:2011cv11547
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gabriel
Defendant:
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences , Dorothy Pumo , Ronald A. DeBellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
