Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ouma v. Portland State University
as 3:2023cv01795
Plaintiff:
Wash Ouma
Defendant:
Portland State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eskew v. Portland State University et al
as 3:2018cv01526
Defendant:
Portland State University and Reuben Simoyi
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Eskew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Leahey v. Skelton et al
as 1:2017cv11948
Plaintiff:
Jennie Tavares Leahey
Defendant:
Judy Blue Horse Skelton, Portland State University, et al, Ramona Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Mohamad Hariri v. Portland State University
as 17-35584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMAD HARIRI
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY
John Ryan, II v. John Harlan, et al
as 17-35495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN II
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HARLAN, Probation Officer, CARL GOODMAN, Assistant Director, Mulnomah Co. Community Justice, Adult Services Division, KEVIN BOWERS, Community Justice Supervisor and others
Mohamad Hariri v. Portland State University
as 17-35280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMAD HARIRI
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Hariri v. Portland State University et al
as 3:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Hariri
Defendant:
Portland State University and Gwen Schusterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liu v. Portland State University et al
as 3:2014cv00908
Defendant:
Jay Auslander, David Baker, Jacqueline Balzer and others
Plaintiff:
Henry D. Liu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Portland State University
as 3:2013cv01416
Plaintiff:
Parker Michael Knight
Defendant:
Portland State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Ryan v. John Harlan, et al
as 11-35264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HARLAN, Probation Officer, CARL GOODMAN, Assistant Director, Mulnomah Co. Community Justice, Adult Services Division, KEVIN BOWERS, Community Justice Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
