Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harpole v. Pike County, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shainey Harpole
Defendant:
Pike County, Missouri, Pike County Missouri Sheriff's Office, Stephen Korte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victim One v. Mehlville R-9 School District et al
as 4:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Victim One
Defendant:
Mehlville R-9 School District, Christopher Gaines, Jeffrey Bresler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Pike et al
as 3:2020cv05015
Defendant:
Sheriff Chris Jennings, Corporal Brandi Pooler, Lieutenant Andy Pike and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie S Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv01929
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gettimier v. Burse, et al
as 4:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Gettimier
Defendant:
Stephen Korte , Mark A. Burse and Pike County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gettimier v. Burse, et al
as 2:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Gettimier
Defendant:
Stephen Korte , Mark A. Burse and Pike County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kearns v. Gregory et al
as 4:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
Darren K. Kearns
Defendant:
Donna Gregory, Donna Gregory, Randy W. Pike and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith, et al v. Pike County R 3 School, et al.
as 2:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Samantha M. Smith, Vernon F. Smith and Debra J. Smith
Defendant:
Pike County R-3 School, Jerry Reisinger, Tim Reller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
