Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Natl Infusion Center v. Becerra
as 24-50180
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, on behalf of itself and its members, Global Colon Cancer Association, on behalf of itself and its members and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, on behalf of itself and its members
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, In Her Official Capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Dierlam v. Biden
as 23-20401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John J. Dierlam
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Fender v. Biden
as 23-20398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Virna Catherine Fender
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense and others
Israel Alvarado v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-1419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISRAEL ALVARADO, STEVEN BARFIELD, WALTER BROBST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force, CARLOS DEL TORO, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy and others
John Dierlam v. Donald Trump, President, et al
as 18-20440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. DIERLAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
John Dierlam v. Donald Trump, President, et al
as 17-20165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. DIERLAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THOMAS PRICE, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Pudlin v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2016cv09550
Plaintiff:
Roger Pudlin
Defendant:
Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Christian and Missionary Allia, et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of, et al
as 15-11437
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, INC., d.b.a. Shell Point Retirement Community, SIMPSON UNIVERSITY, THE ALLIANCE COMMUNITY FOR RETIREMENT LIVING, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Kathleen Melendez v. Secretary Kathleen Sebeliu
as 14-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN I. MELENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese, et al v. Sec, US Dept HHS, et al
as 14-12890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA, an association of churches and schools, WILTON D GREGORY, and his successors, Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA, INC., a Georgia non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
