Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 6:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meisler v. Chrzanowski et al
as 3:2017cv00638
Defendant:
Maria Bowling, Nadine Chrzanowski, Karen Dustman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Meisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
as 16-4133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 2:2016cv00676
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 2:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rodrick DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel, et al
as 14-35534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRICK GORDON DEROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT-NEXTEL, BOISE CITY, ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
In re: Long-distance Telephone Servic
as 12-5380
In Re:
In re: Long-distance Telephone Service Federal Excise Tax Refund Litigation-MDL 1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Gurrola, Virginia Sloan, Gary M. Sable and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Belloni
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service, Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Rodrick DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel, et al
as 12-35849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRICK GORDON DEROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT-NEXTEL, BOISE CITY, ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
MIMMS v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv00950
Defendant:
ABDUL ENTALLABY and SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CARL J. MIMMS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel
as 1:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Gordon DeRock
Defendant:
Sprint-Nextel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
