Cases 1 - 10 of 16
PATTERSON v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
SHAUNA PATTERSON
Defendant:
WALMART, INC. doing business as WALMART, RAYMOND TRENT and MICHAEL SLOWIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taalibuddeen v. Walmart Inc, Headquarters et al
as 1:2022cv01354
Plaintiff:
Zubair R Taalibuddeen
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Headquarters, Walmart Store 4404 and Newberry Township Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSE v. WALMART CORPORATION et al
as 5:2021cv04092
Plaintiff:
JIMI ROSE
Defendant:
WALMART CORPORATION, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE SECURITY GUARD 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SESCEY v. WALMART, ONN UNIT
as 2:2021cv03355
Plaintiff:
NENNET AKAY SESCEY
Defendant:
WALMART, ONN UNIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batty v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02370
Defendant:
Springettsbury Township, Springettsbury Township Police Officers John/Jane Does #s 1-5, Springettsbury Township Police Officer Jamie Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Latoya Batty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SCHIRRA v. MARAK et al
as 2:2020cv01305
Defendant:
THOMAS MARAK, WALMART INC., POINT SECURITY COMPANY INC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. SCHIRRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKKALI v. WALMART, INC.
as 2:2020cv03440
Defendant:
WALMART, INC.
Plaintiff:
MOHSSIN BAKKALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kennedy v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv02092
Defendant:
Austin Evans, Misty L. Peterson, Robert Hays and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
LAURETTA R. KING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MELVIN v. BRITTANY et al
as 2:2017cv01839
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MICHAEL MELVIN, JR.
Defendant:
BRITTANY, DIANE, CRYSTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
