Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, NANCY J. LUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Roy Krieger v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 14-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY WALTER KRIEGER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, LOUDON COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, WARREN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Defendant:
LOUDON COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant:
Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
:
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1845
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Newsome et al v. New York City Board of Elections
as 1:2013cv05787
Plaintiff:
Walter Newsome, Krystal Tolbert and Kenny Krump
Defendant:
New York City Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al
as 2:2012cv02760
Plaintiff:
Reginald Williams
Defendant:
South Carolina State Election Commission , Marci Andino , Charleston County Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
Essex v. Kansas Secretary of State
as 5:2012cv04046
Plaintiff:
Robyn Renee Essex
Defendant:
Kansas Secretary of State
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Craig , Larry Winn, III , Frank Beer and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Kansas, State of
Amicu:
Board of County Commissioners of Johnson County, Kansas and Samuel D. Brownback
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schultz v. State of New York
as 11-4894
Plaintiff:
Doug Bersaw, New Hampshire, Amanda Moore, South Carolina, Arthur Groveman, Florida and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert L. Schulz, New York and John Liggett, New York
Defendant:
State of New Hampshire, State of South Carolina, State of Florida and others
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Douglas Kellner, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections, Evelyn Aquila, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections and others
Cooper et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2011cv00824
Petitioner:
Desean M. Cooper , Charles G. Masich , Dylan G. Quinlan and others
Defendant:
Dennis E. Ward , Ralph M. Mohr , Douglas A. Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
