Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Acer America Corporation et al v. Palm Express, Inc.
as 1:2012cv23244
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corporation and Fubon Insurance Co., LTD
Defendant:
Palm Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Circle 8 Logistics, Inc. v. TAB Express, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03684
Plaintiff:
Circle 8 Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
TAB Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Infinity Auto Express, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kevin Watson
Defendant:
Infinity Auto Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Chubb & Son et al v. BART Enterprises International Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv20747
Plaintiff:
Chubb & Son and Garrido Express, Inc.
Defendant:
BART Enterprises International Ltd., The Antique Wine Company (Franchising) Limited and BAKUS International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Coyote Logistics, LLC v. RS Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00939
Plaintiff:
Coyote Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
RS Express, Inc. and US Expressway Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Integrity Express Logistics, LLC v. ER-Train Express, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
Integrity Express Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
ER-Train Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BNSF Logistics, LLC v. L & N Express, Inc.
as 3:2011cv05810
Plaintiff:
BNSF Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
L & N Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BNSF Logistics, LLC v. L & N Express, Inc.
as 4:2011cv05810
Plaintiff:
BNSF Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
L & N Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Upshaw v. Andrade, et al
as 11-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLOMON UPSHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW ANDRADE, a/k/a Matt and SEA TRADE EXPRESS, INC.
Hanover Insurance Company v. New England Motor Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04434
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
New England Motor Freight, Inc. and New Penn Motor Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
