Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shah et al v. Flat Rate Movers Ltd. et al
as 1:2020cv01204
Defendant:
Flat Rate Elite Services, Inc., Flat Rate Movers Ltd. and Flat Rate Moving, LLC
Plaintiff:
Adam Bauman and Abbas A. Shah
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
REGAL SPRINGS TRADING COMPANY v. ELITE BORDER LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04375
Plaintiff:
REGAL SPRINGS TRADING COMPANY
Defendant:
ELITE BORDER LOGISTICS, INC. and EBT LOGISTICS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montoro v. Westlake Financial Services, LLC et al
as 0:2016cv61066
Plaintiff:
Tatiane Montoro
Defendant:
Westlake Services, LLC, Elite Team Auto Brokers, LLC and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
ZF Wind Power Antwerpen N.V. v. Greatwide/Dallas Mavis et al
as 1:2013cv03198
Plaintiff:
ZF Wind Power Antwerpen N.V.
Defendant:
Greatwide/Dallas Mavis, RJR Elite Trucking Inc. and Phoenix International Business Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc v. Elite Lighting
as 2:2012cv06111
Defendant:
Elite Lighting
Plaintiff:
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc
Jim Dintelman, et al v. Chicot Cty. Memorial Hospital, et al
as 11-2727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jim Dintelman, In His Own Right, doing business as Elite Medical Services, Inc., David Donovan, In His Own Right, doing business as EMS of Southeast Arkansas, Inc., Elite Medical Services, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Chicot County Memorial Hospital Board, Governing, Invdividually and in Offical Capacities, QHR, a Plano Texas Corporation, Fred Zieman, Individually and in His Official Capacity as County Judge of Chicot County Arkansas and others
Dintelman et al v. Chicot County Memorial Hospital et al
as 5:2007cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jim Dintelman, David Donovan and Elite Medical Services Inc
Defendant:
Chicot County Memorial Hospital, Chicot County Memorial Hospital Board, QHR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
