Cases 11 - 17 of 17
-PJG Stratton v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jack Stratton
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County, Richard Jacobsen, Tyrone Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Prosser et al v. National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) et al
as 1:2010cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Prosser, Dawn Prosser, L. Adrian Prosser and others
Defendant:
Sheldon C. Petersen, John J. List, Steven Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Prosser, et al v. Natl Rural Util Coop Fin Corp, et al
as 09-4683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. PROSSER, DAWN PROSSER, LYNDON A. PROSSER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATL RURAL UTIL COOP FIN CORP, NATL RURAL ELEC COOP, SHELDON C. PETERSEN and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
DELOITTE & TOUCHE USA LLP and ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Martinez v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
Mike Martinez, Mike Martinez, Mike Martinez and others
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Phillips et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Phillips, Ronnie Phillips, Ronnie Phillips and others
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co, Sears Roebuck & Co, Sears Roebuck & Co and others
Cross Claimant:
Deere & Company, Deere & Company, Deere & Company and others
Cross Defendant:
MTD Products Inc, MTD Products Inc, MTD Products Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STRATTON v. MYRICK et al
as 1:2008cv00696
Plaintiff:
JACK STRATTON
Defendant:
SUE MYRICK, VIRGINIA FOXX, ROBIN HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meros v. O'Donnell et al
as 1:2007cv00436
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Meros
Defendant:
Terrence O'Donnell, Paul E. Pfeifer, Judith Ann Lanzinger and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
