Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Hill v. Hunt et al
as 3:2007cv02020
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Erin Nance Hill, Melrose Properties, LLC, THH Properties Limited Partnership and others
Trustee:
Peggy Allison, Regions Bank, Chester Donnally and others
Defendant:
Lyda Hill, Ivan Irwin, Jr, Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr Trust Estate and others
Petitioner:
Shamoun & Norman, LLP, Tom M Dees, III, Ellen Flowers and others
Plaintiff:
Albert G Hill, III
Interested Party:
XTO Energy Inc., Jonathan Nockels, David Evans and others
Respondent:
The Aldous Law Firm, Albert G. Hill, III and R. Dean Gresham
Guardian Ad Litem:
Guardian Ad Litem
Intervenor:
Calloway Norris Burdette & Weber PLLC, Blind Faith Speculation LLC and Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP
Receiver:
Daniel L Jackson
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Loren Rancourt v. Joel Bolger, et al
as 23-35064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOREN RANCOURT
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL BOLGER, Honorable, MICHAEL SHAFFER, CAMERON COMPTON, Attorney and others
Hill v. Washburne
as 22-11233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albert G. Hill, III, individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr. Trust Estate, and derivately on Be
Defendant / Appellee:
Heather V. Washburne, Elisa M. Summers, Margaret Keliher, Individually and in her capacity as Trustee of the MHTE and a member of the Advisory Board of the HHTE and others
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Alliance Spine & Joint II, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv23388
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Alliance Spine & Joint II, Inc, Sagi Shaked, Aaron Michael Friedeberg and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rockelle Smith et al v. Sharbino et al
as 1:2022cv03642
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ROCKELLE-SMITH, PIPER ROCKELLE INC., PIPER ROCKELLE SMITH and others
Defendant:
ANGELA SHARBINO, YVONNE DOUGHER, MARIA MEKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tiffany Rockelle Smith et al v. Angela Sharbino et al
as 2:2022cv07384
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Rockelle Smith, Piper Rockelle Inc. and P. R. S.
Defendant:
Angela Sharbino, Yvonne Dougher, Maria Mekus and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Donovan et al. v. Flamingo Palms Villas, LLC, et al.
as 2:2008cv01675
Plaintiff:
Fran Donovan, Craig Mayer, Kimball W. Pugmire and others
Counter Claimant:
Mr. Ian J. Hutagalung, Alexander Oraevsky, Brad Nash and others
Counter Defendant:
Amy Newman, Michael W. Ballard, Gregory Fearon and others
Defendant:
Flamingo Palms Villas, LLC, DC704, LLC, David Schwarz and others
Cross Claimant:
Las Vegas Cay Club Homeowners' Association
Cross Defendant:
JDI Craps, LLC, Dianne Sealey, Faye Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
