Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Holzhauser et al v. Alfonso et al
as 1:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Holzhauser, II and T. D. H.
Defendant:
Margaret Alfonso, Cono Caranna, Brehm T. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hancock, et al v. American Telephone, et al
as 11-6233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAYEN HANCOCK, DAVID CROSS, MONTEZ MUTZIG and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY INC, ATTOPERATIONS INC, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY LP and others
Hancock v. Colorado Structures Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01391
Plaintiff:
Adam Hancock
Defendant:
Colorado Structures Inc., Rob Oldach, Tim Phelan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gerald Hoffarth et al v. Diversified Lending Group Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00336
Defendant:
Applied Equities Inc, Ray Arevalo, Cindy Baltimore and others
Plaintiff:
Sachiko Araki, Tadashi Araki, Tadshi Araki and others
Stephen Ouwinga, et al v. Benistar 419 Plan Services, In, et al
as 10-2531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN OUWINGA, LEANN OUWINGA, DAVID OUWINGA and others
Defendant:
BENISTAR 419 PLAN SERVICES, INC. and BENISTAR LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE, LLP and others
Hancock et al v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00822
Plaintiff:
Gayen Hancock , David Cross , Montez Mutzig and others
Defendant:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company Inc, AT&T Operations Inc, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ouwinga et al v. John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ouwinga, Leann Ouwinga, David Ouwinga and others
Defendant:
Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc., Benistar Ltd., John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
