Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 71 - 75 of 75
Erik Kolar v. Preferred Real Estate Inv Inc, et al
as 08-3119
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIK E. KOLAR
Defendant - Appellee: 240 PRINCETON AVENUE ASSOC, HAMILTON-NJ HOLDINGS, HUNTING FOX ASSOC V and others
Callahan et al v Anton et al
as 0:2008cv60887
Plaintiff: Emerson D. Callahan, Joel W. Hurd, Allen Wagner and others
Defendant: Mark Anton, Sherri Paisley, Ian Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Trotter v. Bank of New York et al
as 3:2008cv00281
Plaintiff: Carolyn Trotter
Defendant: Bank of New York, Ocwen Federal Bank, Hunt Leibert Jacobson, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hill v. Hunt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02020
Intervenor Plaintiff: Erin Nance Hill, Melrose Properties, LLC, THH Properties Limited Partnership and others
Trustee: Peggy Allison, Regions Bank, Chester Donnally and others
Defendant: Lyda Hill, Ivan Irwin, Jr, Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr Trust Estate and others
Petitioner: Shamoun & Norman, LLP, Tom M Dees, III, Ellen Flowers and others
Plaintiff: Albert G Hill, III
Interested Party: XTO Energy Inc., Jonathan Nockels, David Evans and others
Respondent: The Aldous Law Firm, Albert G. Hill, III and R. Dean Gresham
Guardian Ad Litem: Guardian Ad Litem
Intervenor: Calloway Norris Burdette & Weber PLLC, Blind Faith Speculation LLC and Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP
Receiver: Daniel L Jackson
Not Classified By Court: ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
KOLAR v. PREFERRED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03864
Plaintiff: ERIK E. KOLAR
Defendant: PREFERRED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC., ISLAND VIEW CROSSING I, L.P., PREFERRED REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?