Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Spagnuolo v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania et al
as 0:2024cv60422
Plaintiff: Louis Spagnuolo
Defendant: American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company, Chubb Custom Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
America First Insurance Company et al v. Electrostim Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01517
Plaintiff: America First Insurance Company, American Fire and Casualty Company, American States Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Electrostim Medical Services, Inc. and Mario Garcia, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vazquez Commercial Contracting, LLC v. Zieson Construction Company, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00486
Defendant: Rustin Simon, McPherson Contractors, LLC, OnSite Construction and others
Plaintiff: Vazquez Commercial Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hanover American Insurance Company v. Gibbs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00559
Plaintiff: Hanover American Insurance Company
Defendant: Bryan Gibbs, Brandon Gibbs, Treneka Young and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Frederking v. Zurich North America Insurance et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01041
Plaintiff: Thomas Frederking
Defendant: Zurich North America Insurance, Zurich American Insurance Company and Norfolk Southern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Crawford's Auto Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insutance Company et al
as 1:2014cv03146
Plaintiff: Crawford's Auto Center, Inc.
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insutance Company , State Farm General Insurance Company , State Farm Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Mittal, M.D. et al
as 1:2014cv02624
Plaintiff: American Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation, LM Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant: City Care Acupuncture, P.C., Mary Jean Endozo, PT, Billy Geris, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Ellina Matskina, L.Ac. et al
as 1:2014cv01330
Defendant: Acuhealth Acupuncture, PC, Acupuncture Approach, PC, Ada Kulagina, L.Ac. and others
Plaintiff: American Economy Insurance Company, American Fire and Casualty Company, American States Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Puerto Rican American Ins., et al v. Rivera-Vazquez, et al
as 11-2324
Plaintiff - Appellee: PR AMERICAN INSURANC PUERTO RICAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIVERSAL INSURANCE and others
Defendant: CARLOS H. BURGOS-DIAZ, NYDIA ACOSTA-ARROYA, RAFAEL OCASIO-RAMOS and others
Defendant - Appellant: RAFAEL RIVERA VAZQUEZ, ISABEL C. HURTADO and CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP RIVERA-HURTADO
Plaintiff: LUIS MARTINEZ-BORRAS and IVIS HUERTAS
Interested Party: ORIENTAL BANK & TRUST, R&G PREMIER BANK OF PUERTO RICO and UNITED STATES
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Rohn, et al v. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Cen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Plaintiff: MILTON GREENE, CROSSROADS ACQUISITION CORP, WILLIAM M. PORTER and others
Defendant: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party - Appellee: DANA FARBER/HARVARD CANCER CENTER, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?