Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Friedrich Lu v. Jane Young, et al
as 23-2496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR., LESLIE M. GREENSPAN and others
Defendant:
WALTER T. MITCHELL, JAHAD HASAN, ERIC T. DONOVAN and others
Friedrich Lu v. Jane Young, et al
as 23-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, BISOLA OJIKUTU, TIMOTHY J. HARRINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE H. TUCKER, JR., LESLIE M. GREENSPAN, TUCKER LAW GROUP LLC and others
LU v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR, LESLIE MILLER GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. Saylor et al
as 1:2022cv11106
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
F. Dennis Saylor, Jon David Levin, Patti B. Saris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lu v. Canton Corp., et al
as 15-1741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant - Appellee:
CANTON CORP., FAIRFIELD REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CO., ALBERT OGISTE and others
Lu v. Downie et al
as 1:2015cv11558
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Lyndia Downie, Rosemary Cashman, Fred Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lu v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv10920
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Martin J. Walsh, William F. Sinnott, Eugene L. O'Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. The Canton Corp et al
as 1:2015cv10088
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
The Canton Corp, Fairfield Real Estate Management Co., Albert Ogiste and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lu v. Menino et al
as 1:2014cv13053
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino , Martin J. Walsh , William F. Sinnott and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
