Cases 91 - 100 of 6,306
Burnett v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Charles Burnett
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Thompson
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robles v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Maribel Amaya Robles
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steward v. Crow
as 4:2023cv01673
Petitioner:
Randy Andrial Steward
Respondent:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Crabtree
as 5:2023cv01630
Petitioner:
Carlos Jerome Turner
Respondent:
Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cassells v. Delafoisse (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Ish'mael Cassells
Defendant:
Marc Delafoisse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moss v. McClain et al
as 5:2023cv01600
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. McClain et al
as 7:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. State of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Thomas Norton
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
