General Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 759
Stephens v. Doe
as 2:2019cv00370
Respondent: John Doe and Secretary, DOC
Petitioner: David Terence Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wells v. NYC DOC
as 1:2019cv04640
Plaintiff: Michael E. Wells
Defendant: NYC DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allah v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2019cv05131
Respondent: Secretary of DOC, Donald R Holbrook, Stephen Sinclair and others
Petitioner: Allah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz v. Florida et al (Lee County) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00247
Respondent: Florida Attorney General and Secretary, DOC
Petitioner: Casey Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras v. Secretary, DOC (Lee County)
as 2:2019cv00188
Petitioner: Cesar Augusto Contreras
Respondent: Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01063
Respondent: PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner: PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01063
Respondent: PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner: PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ESTEP v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 3:2019cv00022
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARKE, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Petitioner: SCOTT ESTEP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00232
Respondent: John Wetzel, PA DOC Secretary and Mark Garman
Petitioner: Paris Lavar Gantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Victorian v. Secretary, DOC (Lee County)
as 2:2019cv00086
Respondent: Secretary, DOC
Petitioner: Jay Victorian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?