Cases 11 - 20 of 412
Duke v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00950
Petitioner:
Timmy Lynn Duke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. TDCJ et al
as 7:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Cruz
Defendant:
TDCJ, Sheriff Dept, Assistant Warden FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Sheriff Dept et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Petitioner:
Marc Arron Peters
Respondent:
Sheriff Dept and State Hospital
Defendant:
David Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Peters v. Wichita County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00832
Petitioner:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
Wichita County Jail and David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnny Lee Duke v. Warden Crabtree
as 5:2022cv00956
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Duke
Respondent:
Warden Crabtree and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheppard v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Rodney Sheppard, Jr.
Respondent:
Jordan Sandoval, Sheriff David Duke and Marty Cannedy's Secretary Ms. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dukes v. Mutter
as 5:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Steven Jacob Dukes
Respondent:
Scott Mutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly Duke v. Dan Winkleski
as 22-1605
Petitioner / Appellant:
KELLY DUKE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN WINKLESKI, Warden
Hernandez v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00023
Defendant:
Santos V. Hernandez and David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
William McKnight
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant and David Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
