Cases 11 - 20 of 196
WARRINGTON v. ROZUM
as 2:2013cv07396
Petitioner:
KEITH WARRINGTON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOTON v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv07384
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MOTON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRISTINA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01774
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CRISTINA
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GERALD ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOWERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01707
Petitioner:
JOSEPH A. FLOWERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GERALD ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENSON v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv06976
Petitioner:
DAMON LAMONT BENSON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bernardo Burnside v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 13-4383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARDO BURNSIDE
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ONDROVIC v. ROZUM et al
as 1:2013cv02763
Petitioner:
BRAD MARK ONDROVIC
Respondent:
Gerald Rozum and The District Attorney of the County of Carbon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv01406
Petitioner:
JEROME ROBINSON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd Eaddy v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 13-3930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD MAURICE EADDY
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
STRODE v. ROZUM
as 2:2013cv05666
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. STRODE
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
