Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Grandinetti v. Mississippi, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00533
Petitioner:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Respondent:
Mississippi, State of, Tutwiler, City of, Sumner, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roderic Catchings v. Ronald King
as 15-60052
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODERIC C. CATCHINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
James Holmes v. Ernest Lee
as 14-60680
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES L. HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNEST LEE, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
Earnest Herring v. James Hood, III, et al
as 14-60555
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARNEST HERRING
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES M. HOOD, III and EARNEST LEE, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary
James Stern v. Emmitt Sparkman
as 12-60890
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. STERN
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner and Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary
James Stern v. Emmitt Sparkman
as 12-60678
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. STERN
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner and Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary
William Cannon v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-60272
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CANNON
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary and CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Smith v. Mississippi State Penitentiary
as 3:2011cv00631
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Mississippi State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricardo Terrell v. Lawrence Kelly
as 11-60424
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO TERRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Warden, Mississippi State Penitentiary
Kenneth Carter v. Lawrence Kelly
as 10-60540
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH DEWAYNE CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
