Cases 21 - 30 of 258
White v. Bowen (Warden) et al
as 1:2022cv03830
Petitioner:
Jamarcus White
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen (Warden) and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starr v. Bowen
as 5:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Dewayne E Starr
Respondent:
FNU Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bowen
as 4:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
David R. Johnson
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maddox v. Bowen (Warden)
as 1:2022cv02426
Petitioner:
Giovonnte Maddox
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. BOWEN
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
TELVIN BOBBY KING
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon v. Bowen
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Dakarai Harmon
Respondent:
Warden Tommy Bowen and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimmie Bowen v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-11744
Petitioner:
JIMMIE L. BOWEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jackson v. Bowen
as 22-6068
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH MACASTLE JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK BOWEN
Ardoin v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv02255
Petitioner:
Kevin Ardoin
Respondent:
Warden Bowens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(HC)Bowen v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00402
Petitioner:
Errol Alexander Josep Bowen, Jr.
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Polly E. Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
