Cases 21 - 30 of 2,191
Harden v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05413
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Charles D'Mon Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Puleo v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05402
Petitioner:
Steven James Puleo
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05323
Petitioner:
Ray Maurice Brown
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hagans v. Shinn et al
as 4:2019cv00475
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan, David Shinn and others
Petitioner:
Byron L Hagans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wynn v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05294
Petitioner:
Willis Edward Wynn
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chatmon #188310 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05282
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Kolany Chatmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera #121499 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05263
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Rivera
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Mark Brnovich and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Shinn et al
as 3:2019cv08277
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Mack Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones #076408 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05258
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Craig Murray Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennetti #85442 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05244
Petitioner:
Dino Bennetti
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Coleman, Joseph Profiri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
